I debated with myself over writing this post. I don’t really like being negative.
I asked a few friends if they would benefit from a post on what I have used, didn’t like & why. The overwhelming consensus was that it would be very helpful. I tried to make this short and sweet. I pray it’s sweet, but short it is not! Grab yourself a cup of tea, sit back and relax.
Again I have to state right up front that anytime you ask any homeschooler what curriculum they like & use… their first response to your inquiry should be what teaching method they use. Are they un-schoolers, of a classical bent, a scope & sequence proponent, using a school-at-home style or is there something else?
You also need to know the answers to the following questions: Are they Christians? Do they have a view of biblical discipleship and what is it? Are they creationists or evolutionists? How do they view the use of computers?
Some of this I touched on in a earlier post the curriculum I liked & why and will expand that here. You don’t know me so just why should you read what I have to say about homeschool curriculum?
First, I am a Christian. In brief we believe in:
a) scripture alone is the standard (Psalm 119:18; Psalm 138:2; II Tim. 3:14-17);
b) all of life is to be lived for the glory of God (1CO 10:31; 1PE 4:11; REV 1:6; 2PE 3:1; EPH 3:21; REV 7:12; ROM 11:36);
c) I am saved by Jesus Christ’s work alone (1TI 2:5-6; COL 1:13-18);
d) salvation is by faith through grace alone (Ephesians 1:3-8);
e) I am justified by faith alone (Galatians 3:6-11).
We believe the bible clearly states it is the father’s role to teach and disciple his children. We do not believe that a decision between government or private school and homeschool is a morally neutral issue. It is through the day-to-day things that must be done in a home and the school work where we are able to train our son to be a diligent, industrious, cheerful worker ready to take his place in the world and take dominion over his part of it. Our goal is to prepare him for his role as a Christian man/husband/father in society and to accurately apply the bible to every situation he may encounter in his life.
All education is religious by nature as it answers the fundamental questions of who God is, how did we get here and why are we here? We will not leave that teaching up to anyone else, much less to some “government approved” person we know nothing about! We wouldn’t turn our car over to a complete stranger why would we do that with our child, who is far more precious than our vehicle?
In my study of un-schooling I kept coming across the term “child lead learning”. This is in direct opposition to what the bible tells me about the nature of a child and what God requires of me as a parent. All are filled with a sin nature from conception and ‘the way he should go’ will not be the direction he will naturally desire. It is my God-given duty to lead him there anyway. The only thing you don’t have to teach a child is how to sin.
Train up a child in the way he should go,
and when he is old he will not depart from it.
The rod and reproof give wisdom,
but a child left to himself brings shame to his mother.
A wise son makes a glad father, but a foolish son is a sorrow to his mother.
He who sires a fool gets himself sorrow, and the father of a fool has no joy.
A foolish son is a grief to his father and bitterness to her who bore him.
You brood of vipers! How can you speak good, when you are evil? For out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks.
What about the classical education stuff that is all the rage these days? I am not much for that either. It would be more accurate to call it Classical Humanism and in the classical sense that is one who studies “humanities”, the classic Greek & Roman literature. The focus is on the academics and what material and/or social benefit can be attained thereby. Classical schooling recommends highly questionable materials all in the name of “good literature”. But who deemed these “good”? Do they conform to Philippians 4:8?
Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.
Sadly most of the “classical humanism” recommended materials do not line up with scriptural principles. I know, I have read some of it in my ‘government school career’ and well before I was saved. There are just some thoughts and ideas that do not belong in a young, impressionable mind.
What about scope & sequence? Don’t some curriculum come with those? Well, yes, some do include a scope & sequence or have it available if you want one. It is the application of the scope and sequence, believing that all children will know certain information at certain ages that is objectionable. The program of scope and sequence must be adapted to the individual child. Children are not automatons or need-some-assembly units on a conveyor belt all able to digest the same information at the same speed as each other and coming out the end of a 12 year program “educationally assembled”. This is by its nature what the government school system must be to process all those ‘units’ out the end in an ‘efficient’ manner. This system cannot ever provide the necessary behavioral and moral training living and growing children need. In my homeschool, the last thing I want is to recreate the ‘government school’ at home!
Brand me as a heretic, but I do not believe that all teaching methodologies are scriptural.
“All things are lawful for me,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful for me,” but I will not be enslaved by anything. I Corinthians 6:12
“All things are lawful,” but not all things are helpful. “All things are lawful,” but not all things build up. I Corinthians 10:23
Do not be conformed to this world, but be transformed by the renewal of your mind, that by testing you may discern what is the will of God, what is good and acceptable and perfect.
Wow. Is there anything left?
Yes! The Trivium!!
Um… OK… what is that? In a nutshell it is Christian homeschooling in a classical style
Wait!! You just said that you didn’t like the classical education so what gives?
This is limiting the meaning of classical to include only what is of good form and lasting value (classical), and which conforms to a Biblical standard within a Biblical worldview (Christian). The focus is taking out of all cultures and times what is redeemable for Christ. Not trying to baptize these cultures, in whole or in part, and call that “Christian”. You can read more on what the Trivium is, and how to implement it in “Teaching the Trivium” by Harvey & Laurie Bluedorn.
All the questions mentioned above have been answered except one. My view of computers. Before you brand me an a neanderthal along with a heretic let me tell you I like computers for the tools they are. But my child-raising philosophy does not see much good in computers for young, developing children. That also includes television. I believe a child should have lots of one-on-one time with a real live, living and breathing human being along with lots of outdoor play. I do not believe that the one-on-one time should be child-centered and exclusively of an entertainment mindset. There is so much that needs accomplishing in a day that there is little time to spend all day “playing” with the children!
Children need to be included in all the things you do everyday. They can help fold the small things when you are folding laundry. They can load the clothes into the washer (get them a stool so they can reach)! They can switch the laundry from the washer to the dryer. Give them a spray bottle of water to help ‘clean’ the counters & mirrors in the bathroom. Have them pick up and put away their toys. Give them a small rag to dust the lower shelves, under the coffee table, and any other lower furniture pieces. Very young children can do SO MUCH MORE than what we think they can do! Even a 3-year-old can vacuum, at least the center areas! They can stir what’s in the bowl, tear the lettuce, set the table and I could go on but I think you get the picture. Including your children in your chores gives them a sense of purpose and that they are contributing to the family.
With that, let us begin with what I have used and didn’t like and why.
1. What have you used that you didn’t like? Why?
A) The Well Trained Mind
Ms. Bauer’s focus is strictly on the academics and the academic achievement brought by homeschooling. We are first and foremost interested in the character of our child above the academics. Less you think we don’t do any academics, let me assure you we DO, and plenty of them. But our focus is on the character of the child through the academics, chores, etc.
In our previous church most of the homeschoolers were using Ms. Bauer’s materials and couldn’t sing its praises enough. So I bought a copy. After reading it completely I was less than impressed to say the least. It’s all academics, page after page of academics. The how to and where to and why to… do the academics. The book is broken down into the three learning stages a child goes through, 1) the grammar, 2) the logic and 3) the rhetoric stages. In each of these three sections the “religious instruction” comprises a measly 3 pages. In the grammar stage there are no resources listed except to say ‘see your religious community’. In the entire 810 pages (yes I kept my copy) there are 9 pages devoted to the most important area in the life of anyone – the knowledge of Jesus Christ and his need of a savior.
I was saddened to know that there are so many Christian homeschoolers using this material and taking her recommendations for what to teach and when. In the grammar stage she recommends materials to study the Greek gods, the Egyptian gods, the Olympus gods & goddesses, Shakespeare, Fairy stories of India & Ireland and that’s just 1st grade!
The bible says, “Fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction.” Proverbs 1:7 Our greatest desire is to teach and train Arrow to know and love the Lord God Almighty with all his heart and all his mind and all his soul and all his strength. “The Well Trained Mind” just didn’t seem to be of any help in that essential area.
The other thing I highly disliked is her improper use of “her” as a non-gender specific, singular pronoun. It is perfectly acceptable, proper English usage to use “he”, “him” and “his” as non-gender specific, singular pronouns. Not only is it acceptable, but was used for centuries! It is the communist/ feminist ideology that suddenly makes the usage of these non-gender specific, singular pronouns unacceptable! Don’t get me started on the number gender agreement problems with using “they” as a singular pronoun. It is not now, nor will “they” ever be a singular pronoun! [off soap box]
[where’s that paper bag…? breathe in… breathe out… breathe in… breathe out…]
B) Story of the World V1
by Susan Wise Bauer- very UN-biblical in worldview – I almost threw it against the wall in disgust…,
but returned it instead and got my valuable money refunded 😉
It characterizes ‘early’ man as an evolved, not very intelligent, hominid being. The blatantly UN-biblical view and anti-Christian tone were offensive.
I know when I read my bible, Adam was created as a highly functioning, intelligent man. He was immediately able to name all the animals and take instructions from the Lord. It is in chapter 4 where there is the mention of Jubal who is the father of those who play the lyre and pipe and Tubal-Cain who is the father of those who forge instruments of bronze and iron. You have to be pretty smart in order to teach someone else to play an instrument or forge bronze or iron implements. These people were also building cities and had livestock! Cities mean large numbers of people in close proximity. City dwelling makes a hunter/gatherer type of existence impossible. Noah also planted a vineyard right after the flood, so the knowledge of planting & harvesting grapes and making wine existed before the flood as well. I may have missed some things but all this tells me that early man was smart right from the start.
C) Hooked on Phonics – too juvenile for my older (then 13yr) learner, expensive,
D) Mystery of History; Vol I – not enough there, not able to easily substitute my own materials, first volume uses slang expressions (cool, etc.) which I found very irritating, the course is not yet completed (as of this writing), we would have had to switch to something else later anyway… I was looking for… something… more/else/different than this. I wanted meat to the study without bogging down in the details yet flexible enough for us to camp on any “detail” we felt we needed/wanted to study in more depth. This is biblical in it’s treatment of history yet doesn’t go far enough on that front for my tastes.
E) Making Math Meaningful – at one point Arrow just did not get a concept. We followed the instructions for coming back to that section later, which we did. Still he did not get the concept we were returning to. There were absolutely no additional resources to enable us to ‘camp out’ in that or any other section unless I wrote more pages. I had no interest in writing my own math curriculum… that’s what I was buying one for! This taught addition and subtraction all together, which can make it confusing to a young student (which this is meant for…). If I was starting over with Arrow I wouldn’t start with formal education as early as I did. We started him when he was 6 and a half. I would have spent more time on character issues, chores, reading aloud and making learning part of our daily lives. (two eggs plus two eggs makes how many eggs? while making cookies, etc.) I also know more about digit spans and would have spent more time on them!
OK, that is a whole different post… I’ll discuss that soon! Subscribe to my blog so you don’t miss it.
F) the Phonics Game – too expensive, I used this many years ago and the videos had the ‘mom’ dressed in tight spandex as she and her ‘son’ roller bladed around discussing ‘phonics’ (I would skip that part!) otherwise the card game is an excellent way to learn reading rules while playing & having fun!
G) Worldviews of the Western World 1 – I did use this for Peter Rabbit. After we pulled out of the government indoctrination center in 7th grade (1992). It is good, but with Tapestry of Grace, we learn the same thing (also as meaty as we desire) only in its historic context, it does not have the ability to be used with younger students at the same time (as Tapestry of Grace does), you actually read pagan materials (The Iliad, the Odyssey, The Aeneid & The Republic) though you do contrast them with the bible, but…
We choose this because we were brand new Christians, had limited biblical knowledge ourselves and Peter Rabbit was raised with no church background. We were interested in trying to build a biblical foundation in his learning. The biblical materials are excellent, meaty and worth having in your library. The discussions are excellent and the required essays are thought provoking. I loved the music and art portions where you can “see” & “hear” the effects of these pagan, anti-biblical philosophies on the culture.
I would recommend this with great caution. You know the bent of your student(s) best. If you think reading pagan material might foster or encourage a love for fantasy, mysticism, paganism, etc I would steer clear of this material. There is no way to use this without the reading of the pagan materials. And for some students, even contrasting the pagan materials with the very good biblical materials might just not be… enough. Just a caution.
G) Lifepacs from Alpha & Omega –
I did use some of these our very first year homeschooling ‘Peter Rabbit’ in the early 90’s. I am not saying there is anything wrong with the content. I have not examined them for content issues. My problem is with them as workbooks. This is recreating the government school style in your home! Workbooks are relied upon by the government school teachers because they cannot possibly give individual attention to all 30 students in their classes! Workbooks are busy work. Maybe if I had lots of girls I would have a different view, but with boys… oh don’t kill their love of learning by giving them tons of workbooks!
I pray this post is a blessing to you! What things have you used in your homeschool that you didn’t like and why?
Blessings, ~Aunt Mae (aka ~Mrs. R)
Other posts that may be of interest to you:
Why We Attend the Christian Heritage Conference
IndoctriNation the Movie
Why We Homeschool
Homeschool Curriculum – What I Use and Why I Use It
All art from Art.com. I have an affiliate link in my sidebar. Being an affiliate for certain companies is one way I attempt to supplement out income. You can help us by purchasing through one of my affiliate links.
This post also linked here: The Better Mom, What Joy is Mine, Raising Arrows, Finding Heaven, Homestead Revival, Far Above Rubies, Time Warp Wife, Growing Home, A Pause on the Path, Thankful Homemaker, Raising Homemakers, A Wise Woman Builds Her Home, We Are THAT Family, Deep Roots at Home, A Mother’s Heritage, Intentional Me, Our Simple Country Life, At the Picket Fence, Best Post of the Week, Serenity Now, Homemaker by Choice, Comfy in the Kitchen, Finding Beauty, Visionary Womanhood,